Maybe for some flights, but I suggest that is a very broad statement to apply to all flights. Yield Management is a very complex art where generalities generally do not apply.
Registered Users have the option of removing this |
cost of the flight and business and first class is the profit
just wondering if its true
Maybe for some flights, but I suggest that is a very broad statement to apply to all flights. Yield Management is a very complex art where generalities generally do not apply.
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
I would guess that in general terms that is about right. Of course, there has been much written about the excessive fares on the trans-pacific route when there waas limited competition on that route.
But I'd expect that airlines will set their economy airfares at about the cost of moving a person on that flight. Maybe with some profit overall if all economy is sold - i.e cheapest fare at cost price and more expensive economy fares cost price + profit. The premium fares then cover that base cost and get more cash, which is then offset by the level of service provided. So premium fare = cost price + service charge + profit. Then I guess one trick is to minimise the cost of providing the service, and bearing in mind that the cost of providing service is spent whether or not you have premium pax.
Edit: this is a general appreciation, as NM mentions it is not going to be correct in all situations.
I'd be more inclined to think that the passengers in first and biz subsidize the cheap seats at the back.
"Family. Religion. Friendship. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business" - C. Montgomery Burns
First Class isn't a seat, it's a lifestyle.
"You cannot spend money in luxury without doing good to the poor. Nay, you do more good to them by spending it in luxury, than by giving it; for by spending it in luxury, you make them exert industry, whereas by giving it, you keep them idle."-
Samuel Johnson
A source from a large airline once told me that, all things being equal (ie under normal economic circumstances with sustainable fare levels), at least 70% of Economy has to be filled for the flight to break even, as Economy covers the fixed costs of the flight. When that threshold is met, Business and First cabins start being profitable - think of them as the cream on top.
This simply doesnt work as an accounting concept. Sure it is interesting to talk about but saying " x pays for Y and z is profit" is just shuffling the allocation.
You could flip it totally and say "J/F pays for the flight and whY is the profit".
Essentially the cost of the flight is X and the revenue is A+B+C (or A+B+C+D if you have why+) and the difference is profit. All the rest is people justifying their jobs...
Rock On Corporate Corporate Account managers
Don't forget that they also carry freight and mail on board as well and that'd earn them some cash for the flight.
I don't think any one area pays for the flight itself, because remember that eccon is split into many different classes, for example tomorrow morning I can fly from MEL - CBR in eccon and pay $368, or I can fly on the exact same flight, and sit in the exact same seat and get the exact same level of service and only pay $89.
Obviously QF would have made far more money from me by me paying $368, but I doubt they are making a loss from me only paying $89 (their probably not making much of a profit either, but for them it's guarenteed income with no risk)
Indeed. I think that if there was any subsidy it would be the Y fares subsidising the N fares. If you're not planning to at the absolute very least break even in economy, then there doesn't seem to be much point in being an airline
Or maybe that should be A+B+C+D+E+F+G+H+I+J+K+L+M+N+O+P+Q+R+S+T+U+V+W+X+Y+ Z+freight
given that there are so many different fare types purchased. And even within each booking class there are different fares. And the "revenue" realised from FF redemptions. And the on-board duty-free sales. And ...
It all goes to the revenue side of the ledger.
And while it may be interesting to look at it at the micro-accounting level of a per-flight basis, I expect the major airlines look it more at a macro level of routes and even overall performance, where some individual flights may operate with less than attractive micro-accounting ledger entries, but they contribute to an overall business result that is less easy to measure at the micro level.
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)