Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.
More
I have tried "searching" for this without much success... so I'll go ahead and ask...
What planning aids are recommended for working up the best *A RTW.... "best" in this case meaning most efficient/maximum use of the miles available.....
We see plenty of detailed (and interesting!) threads on DONE4's etc.. are the *A RTW's not as good?
I would need to visit Prague.. and get around the USA a bit... that's all... everything else can be for fun and FF return...
Suggestions?
And a curly one.. has anyone incorporated NZ's Y+ on a RTW???
Mu understanding (although I may well be wrong) is that *A RTW products are mileage based, and thus maximising frequent flyer points can only occur to the level of which you are going to pay for (the minimum is 26K with the max at 39K). This contrasts highly to the One World continent fares where as you would have seen, mileage can easily exceed 55K, all for the one price. This also explains why we see so much about the xONEx's and not Oneworld's mileage fares.
There is an excellent tool that IMO is much better than the Oneworld program, available from the *A website that is an interactive planner and whilst it does have bugs, generally does a reasonable job at verifying your routing.
Hope this helps before some wiser members (ie. KiwiFlyer, NM and Simongr) can help.
Yes, I am sure you are right.... I am really leaning towards doing it in J/C as a one time treat... but will have to look at the "return" first... and I'd have to seriously look at how/if one could have the RTW originate elsewhere...... given the different pricings from other start points!
I might just be better off booking NZ Y+ SYD-LAX (stopover? I assume that's possible)-LHR then intra europe on I dunno. LH? - then back either through the USA again or via HKG.. again NZ Y+... as there is no Y+ RTW offered...
If I do the mileage based one then I'd simply maximise the usage... and try to go to places I haven't been before... Make sense?
I'll be *G by then, with some certs and AD's to burn on upgrades.......
ONE problem is I would HAVE to just transit through LHR.... the "restricted goods" I will be carrying for the competitions I'm going to are not legal in the UK... so there's another complication! I will of course speak to the High Commission here well in advance to ensure such transit is OK! (Can't see why not - I wouldn't actually be entering the country!)
Last edited by trooper; 10th May 2007 at 06:22 PM.
The one thing to be careful with is that if you have a land segment (ie. arrive at one point and leave from another), this is included in your mileage.
Definitely splurge and go for J, if you are personally going to pay for Business Class and aren't Bill Gates or the like, the best value of a J fare is to travel RTW as you probably know.
Just wondering though, why are you considering the *A fare? Generally the xONEx can give you better mileage (ie, you're not limited to 39K and can really push it with long sectors like KiwiFlyer's LHR-MCT) and coupled with an AA challenge, can give OW status very easily and loads of points.
It IS tempting... but I am ONLY a recreational traveller.. and pay every cent of the cost myself.... I'm a bachelor with a paid off mortgage so I CAN splurge a reasonable amount each year on something I enjoy... but I don't want to go crazy!!
If I start splitting travel between TWO alliances I'm concerned I'd end up as "NOBODY" status on BOTH!
You see my "normal" travel is SYD-LAX... and that's only once or twice a year.. add to that one trip SYD-CHC-SYD, and it doesn't amount to a whole lot! (I stand in AWE of the travel some of the folks here do!!) I won't routinely pay for C/J - can't justify it to myself... my personal "compromise" has been to fly NZ's Y+ as soon as it appeared... I had been flying Y with them for a few years anyway... (had a bad experience with QANTAS a while back..) with current travel plans I'll hit Gold about next March - and due to extra trips in this period I think I'll actually make GE.. so the "slide" back to no real status will take until 2010... my understanding is NZ only drops you one level per year...(?)
I plan to use all the AD's for upgrade requests from Y+ to BP.. as to ME that represents the best "return on investment"... and I assume as I go to *G etc the (standby) upgrades are more likely to clear... (?)
If I start splitting travel between TWO alliances I'm concerned I'd end up as "NOBODY" status on BOTH!
Hmm, I understand completely. It may be time to give QF a chance again. Admittedly, if in economoy the 31" pitch compared to NZ's 34" may be a little tough.
If you are going to travel J class though on a DONEx, you need to weigh up your options. You are almost guaranteed AA Platinum under a challenge, equivalent to QFGold so you wouldn't end up a nobody in OW's books. You may drop back to AA Gold the year after but this is still the equivalent of QF Silver. Not really sure what your staus with NZ and *A involves but AA Platinum would give you lounge access and good chances of upgrades .
Don't think I could cope with that 31" pitch again..... it'll be hard enough going back to Y+ in October after my recent return from LAX in BP!!!!
Nah.. not really.. now that the AKL-LAX flights are back to 744's (thanks to Kiwi flyer for that comforting bit of info!) I'll be requesting MY favorite seats there..... main deck pair... and probly enjoying it again....
That will be followed by 9 domestic flights with UA.... wonder how I can sneak into E+!!!
Good luck, definitely agree with the seat pitch in economy. Flew NZ on an NZ mini RTW at Christmas and was so impressed with their seat pitch (and food). My TA had arranged for all window seat exit rows but as I found out the hard way, on the 744 the exit row window seat is taken up by the door and has no window so i would move back into the normal seats for a row of 3. The 777's were great however!!!
Needless to say really, I got back and within three days headed away again with work on QF domestic and felt so claustrophobic.
There isn't much mention of *A RTWs on AFF simply because almost all members are tied with one world.
Some of us do use these products extensively. Even though mileage based they are very flexible (some nicer rules than OW equivalent, global explorer), can earn much more than OW equivalent (higher booking class in economy), and *A has a wider global network than OW (australia and south america excepted).
On a single business class RTW I have earned enough for a round trip award in business class from oz/nz to europe. Try doing that on a DONE4 crediting to QFF!
FT's *A forum has the best info. I have some trip reports that include *A RTWs, including one from April. On www.staralliance.com click on RTW mileage calculator tool. It isn't perfect but does a good job of applying the rules and schedules for mapping out an itinerary. You need an airline or travel agent to check availability - the tool doesn't do this - but there are some publicly available tools you can use to get an idea.
NZ Premium Economy can be included on a *A RTW, for a surcharge.
Originally Posted by xRWSTARx rules effective 1 May 2007
D. NZ Pacific Premium Economy upgrade surcharge on
AKL-LON/LAX/SFO and vv
AKL/CHC-NRT and vv
AKL-HKG and vv
AKL/CHC-KIX and vv
LAX/HKG-LON and vv
AKL-SHA and vv
AKL-SYD/MEL/BNE and vv
NZ Pacific Premium Economy is available for passengers
paying Economy RTW fare at a surcharge of USD100 for AKLSYD/
MEL/BNE and USD300 for all other sectors. Child/infant
discounts apply. The surcharge must be reflected as a Qsurcharge
after the applicable sector. No surcharge applies for
passengers paying First/Business Class RTW fares. NZ Pacific
Premium Economy is booked in E class. For the purpose of this
rule the following are considered two sectors AKL-LON and vv
(i.e. AKL-LAX/LAX-LHR) and MEL-LAX and vv (i.e. MELAKL/
AKL-LAX)
You can also upgrade SAS intercontinental flights to Economy Extra (for a surcharge), and both Singapore and Thai's ultralonghaul nonstop flights from Singapore and Bangkok to Los Angeles and New York have a surcharge. Flights which stop en route don't have this surcharge.
If you upgrade too many sectors you may be better off purchasing business class.
Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.
More
With *A you have many more ways to avoid UK than with OW. Although if wanting to make NZ*E, which requires a certain level of earning on NZ operated flights, the extra earning to LHR is tempting. If not needed then most of the airbucks are earned on the leg to LAX so not missing much by then flying to a european hub.
When NZ's AKL-YVR service starts it will make it even easier to avoid both USA (go via YVR instead) and UK (go via YVR/YYZ/YUL Vancouver/Toronto/Montreal) on a *A RTW.
Originally Posted by trooper
due to extra trips in this period I think I'll actually make GE.. so the "slide" back to no real status will take until 2010... my understanding is NZ only drops you one level per year...(?)
I plan to use all the AD's for upgrade requests from Y+ to BP.. as to ME that represents the best "return on investment"... and I assume as I go to *G etc the (standby) upgrades are more likely to clear... (?)
Yes that is right - soft landing for those who fail to requalify for status.
Yup clear rate for upgrades is much better for GE than for anyone else on NZ flights. Still not easy on LAX flights.
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by trooper 
