+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 24

Thread: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

  1. #11
    Mal
    Mal is offline
    Senior Member Mal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    London
    Posts
    7,170

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Registered Users have the option of removing this
    and all other advertisements.  More

    Qantas has Tiger by the tail | The Courier-Mail
    "Qantas executive general manager John Borghetti said he was not in business to help his rivals.

    "It is normal practice for any business to have all of its arrangements in place before it starts operating," Mr Borghetti said.

    "Assisting competitors is not part of my job description." "


  2. #12
    Member pauly7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Posts
    976

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Bit of a funny story, was reading this thread thinking 'Oh well thats the risk you take with an LCC I guess' and thinking that it was pretty rough of Tiger just to abandon their passengers without even rebooking them (I mean even DJ did that at the start)...

    Then, my sister calls, who is backpacking around from Aus next week with a friend, and was booked onto a Tiger/Alice flight. I resisted the 'didn't you see all the *pending approval etc notices' but to 'normal flyers' they are very small type notices on the website combined with 1000 other notices and easy to miss. Understandbly she is furious about it and not happy about also having to wait 2 weeks before Tiger will refund.

    Apparently the Tiger call centre have been quite rude saying they can't get it refunded any more quickly (which is rubbish, if you really want to you can do CC refunds on the spot, the only thing that is stopping them is their own red tape) which is pretty annoying for people.

    I think its pretty crap they aren't rebooking them either, I do understand why - because they can't afford to, (Tigers call centre excuse 'We aren't a travel agent we can't book other airlines') but I still don't think it is right.

    What I do know is that they would have lost alot of potential customers who have been burnt by this.

  3. #13
    milocole
    Guest milocole's Avatar

    Wink Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by pauly7
    Bit of a funny story, was reading this thread thinking 'Oh well thats the risk you take with an LCC I guess' and thinking that it was pretty rough of Tiger just to abandon their passengers without even rebooking them (I mean even DJ did that at the start)...

    Then, my sister calls, who is backpacking around from Aus next week with a friend, and was booked onto a Tiger/Alice flight. I resisted the 'didn't you see all the *pending approval etc notices' but to 'normal flyers' they are very small type notices on the website combined with 1000 other notices and easy to miss. Understandbly she is furious about it and not happy about also having to wait 2 weeks before Tiger will refund.

    Apparently the Tiger call centre have been quite rude saying they can't get it refunded any more quickly (which is rubbish, if you really want to you can do CC refunds on the spot, the only thing that is stopping them is their own red tape) which is pretty annoying for people.

    I think its pretty crap they aren't rebooking them either, I do understand why - because they can't afford to, (Tigers call centre excuse 'We aren't a travel agent we can't book other airlines') but I still don't think it is right.

    What I do know is that they would have lost alot of potential customers who have been burnt by this.
    I was quite shocked by Tiger doing this, seriously they have lost THOUSANDS of customers, anyway if they didn't get approval, this is what they would have done, just refunded people, and the airline would probaly have gonw under as well. Anway im leaving in about 20 mins for my TT flight to the GC, ill be taking heaps of phots, videos etc, and pics of the T4, and T3 at the Gold coast. I hope on VH-VNC (new), anyway i will post my LONG report on this forum or airline quality review website on either Sun, Mon, or tuesday. I will most likely write this from one of those web cafes at Broadbeach at Pacif Fair, Im sooooo nervous, BYE

  4.    Sponsored Links



    Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More



  5. #14
    Member SeaWolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2007
    Location
    Perth
    Posts
    482
    FF Prog
    Velocity, QFF, Asiana Club

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Isn't there regulations about monopoly providers refusing service to potential competitors? After all, Telstra has long been forced to provide access to its network.

    The people who really lose out in all this are the people of Alice Springs, who are going to have to keep paying monopoly rates to QF until TT can get itself setup. It's certianly not going to help raise QF's image in their eyes. If QF wants to keep hanging onto that 65% share of the domestic market its going to have to start to accept that it isn't the only bird in the sky anymore and that it needs to being appealing to consumers, rather than acting like they have nowhere else to go.

  6. #15
    Senior Member oz_mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    9,487
    FF Prog
    QF FF, SQ KF, DJ Velocity, MH enrich

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by pauly7
    Bit of a funny story, was reading this thread thinking 'Oh well thats the risk you take with an LCC I guess' and thinking that it was pretty rough of Tiger just to abandon their passengers without even rebooking them (I mean even DJ did that at the start)...
    In most cases, Tiger are 'abandoning' people in their home town (Melbourne). Also, you would need to consider what reaccommodation options would even be available if they were going to do this. It is one thing to reaccomodate on a MEL-SYD sector, but MEL-ASP could be quite a different story.

  7. #16
    NM
    NM is offline
    Moderator NM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2004
    Posts
    12,564
    FF Prog
    AA Exec Plat; QF LTG; PC Plat; HHonors Gold

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by SeaWolf
    Isn't there regulations about monopoly providers refusing service to potential competitors? After all, Telstra has long been forced to provide access to its network.
    That probably depends on your definition of a "monopoly". Is Qantas the only groiund handling provider at that location only because nobody else has bothered to establish the facilities? Or is there some regulation or other impediment protecting Qantas as the sole service provider?

    And has anybody confirmed that Qantas refused to provide the service, or was it just that the two parties could not agree on mutually acceptable terms? I can imagine QF would be reluctant to offer terms that would be desirable to TT.


  8. #17
    Senior Member oz_mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    9,487
    FF Prog
    QF FF, SQ KF, DJ Velocity, MH enrich

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by SeaWolf
    Isn't there regulations about monopoly providers refusing service to potential competitors? After all, Telstra has long been forced to provide access to its network.

    The people who really lose out in all this are the people of Alice Springs, who are going to have to keep paying monopoly rates to QF until TT can get itself setup. It's certianly not going to help raise QF's image in their eyes. If QF wants to keep hanging onto that 65% share of the domestic market its going to have to start to accept that it isn't the only bird in the sky anymore and that it needs to being appealing to consumers, rather than acting like they have nowhere else to go.
    Certainly, it seems that someone in Qantas has taken a rather childish attitude, and maybe there are legal avenues for Tiger to investigate.

    Reading between the lines of this whole thing, I suspect that Tiger and Qantas had negotiated on access, but it got stopped somewhere up in the approval process within Qantas.

  9.    Sponsored Links



    Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More



  10. #18
    Member Petch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Posts
    191

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by oz_mark
    someone in Qantas has taken a rather childish attitude, and maybe there are legal avenues for Tiger to investigate.
    It would seem, there might be other avenues as well -

    "It is ironic that a subsidiary of Singapore Airlines, a Tiger Airways shareholder, provides ground handling to both Qantas and Jetstar in Singapore" Tony Davis

    e-Travel Blackboard: Australia's Number One Industry Newsletter

  11. #19
    Senior Member oz_mark's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2002
    Location
    Melbourne
    Posts
    9,487
    FF Prog
    QF FF, SQ KF, DJ Velocity, MH enrich

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Quote Originally Posted by Petch
    It would seem, there might be other avenues as well -

    "It is ironic that a subsidiary of Singapore Airlines, a Tiger Airways shareholder, provides ground handling to both Qantas and Jetstar in Singapore" Tony Davis

    e-Travel Blackboard: Australia's Number One Industry Newsletter
    Doubt there is much they could do - there are other ground handling providers in Singapore that would be ready, willing and able to do the job if SATS stopped.

  12. #20
    Member Standby's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2006
    Posts
    344

    Re: Tiger forced to delay Alice Springs launch

    Registered Users have the option of removing this
    and all other advertisements.  More


    Quote Originally Posted by Petch
    It would seem, there might be other avenues as well -

    "It is ironic that a subsidiary of Singapore Airlines, a Tiger Airways shareholder, provides ground handling to both Qantas and Jetstar in Singapore" Tony Davis

    e-Travel Blackboard: Australia's Number One Industry Newsletter
    As always the devil is in the detail and never let fact get in the way of a good whinge.
    The subsidary is called SATs ...a ground handling company NOT an airline. also lets not use the Kevin Bacon 7 degrees of separation here...Sats is also a subsidary of the Sin govt Its role is to provide cost effective ground handling for an airport with a bit more Through-put than ASP...inorder the expand their economy..there is nothing stopping the NT GOVT doing likewise...or heaven forbit Tiger do their own.

+ Reply to Thread
Page 2 of 3
FirstFirst 1 2 3 LastLast

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

     

Similar Threads

  1. Tiger hits a snag: ‘proving’ flight postponed
    By futaris in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 105
    Last Post: 23rd November 2007, 09:20 AM
  2. The McDonald's of the Air - Tiger Airways
    By mbeder in forum Open Discussion
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 30th July 2007, 10:30 AM
  3. Distance MEL to Alice Springs / Ayers Rock
    By rpmsol in forum Your Questions
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 28th March 2007, 03:02 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77