Even if the minimum was increased by 2" it would have no impact to those travelling on most non-LCC carriers since they are at that level anyway.
Dave
Registered Users have the option of removing this |
All airlines should be forced to increase leg room on planes by at least 2 inches (5 cm), British legislators said on Wednesday.
The House of Lords Science and Technology Committee said space between seats on commercial flights should be increased from the current minimum of 26 inches (66 cm) to at least 28.2 inches (71.6 cm).
Call for more leg room on aircraft - News - Travel - smh.com.au
Even if the minimum was increased by 2" it would have no impact to those travelling on most non-LCC carriers since they are at that level anyway.
Dave
Are there any carriers that have 26" seat pitch? If so: mental note to self: avoid if at all possible.Originally Posted by Dave Noble
The seat pitch lowest I have ever been on is about 30", so would not have made any difference to me. There must be some really tight charter operators in Europe.
And of course increasing seat pitch by 10% logically means an average of 10% less seats so 10% less revenue. Are we all willing to accept a 10% fare increase to compensate for the extra pitch?
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Seat spacing as defined by CAA is different to the top of seatback-seatback that is typically used and would seem to be a better measurement. It measures from the front bottom of the seat back to the back of the seat in front rather than back of top of seat to back of seat behind so shows exactly what space is available for legs whilst the tradtional measurement is affected by thickness of the seats.Originally Posted by dajop
There are carriers using 26" under CAA measurements though not airlines such as QF who would not be affected
Have a look at Seat Pitch
Dave
"Family. Religion. Friendship. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business" - C. Montgomery Burns
First Class isn't a seat, it's a lifestyle.
"You cannot spend money in luxury without doing good to the poor. Nay, you do more good to them by spending it in luxury, than by giving it; for by spending it in luxury, you make them exert industry, whereas by giving it, you keep them idle."-
Samuel Johnson
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)