To participate you will need to enter your login details:
Go Back   The Australian Frequent Flyer Online Community> > Community Resources > Open Discussion
 
   

 


Travel Insurance
product picture

Air Berlin in the news

» Read Article

From the City of Churches to a weekend in SIN.

» Read Report


Reply

Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 09:12 AM
Warks's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
Member of: QFF Silver, QC, UA
Posts: 185
Rough landings?

In the past 12 months or more I've noted how smooth aircraft landings in the big planes have become. Sometimes I've been hard pressed to notice the touchdown. However yesterday I took a 737 (QF) to MEL and a 767 back to SYD and both landings were loud and rough. Not an unbalanced one wheel hitting after the other type rough but just a loud bang and jolt as we hit the ground each time. Most people noticed!
Wondering if anyone else has had this experience lately and whether some new technology has improved landings in general (except these two!)

Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More
  #2 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 10:07 AM
NM's Avatar
NM NM is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member of: AA Exec Plat; QF LTG; PC Plat; HHonors Gold
Posts: 10,055
Any landing you walk away from is a good landing. If the aircraft can be used again, then its even better.
__________________
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Reply With Quote
  #3 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 11:37 AM
v8Statesman's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: PER
Member of: QF Platinum, Gold ff.com.au
Posts: 906
Send a message via ICQ to v8Statesman
Quote:
Originally Posted by NM
Any landing you walk away from is a good landing. If the aircraft can be used again, then its even better.
My Father used to say "Every Landing is a crash. One is controlled, the other is not"
Reply With Quote
  #4 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 01:12 PM
oz_mark's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Melbourne
Member of: QF FF, SQ KF, DJ Velocity, MH enrich
Posts: 6,823
Hadn't noticed any real change in the landings, although my perception is that the 767's seem to land harder than the other aircraft in the QF fleet.
Reply With Quote
  #5 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 03:00 PM
infoworks's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Sydney
Posts: 323
Send a message via ICQ to infoworks Send a message via MSN to infoworks Send a message via Yahoo to infoworks
Don't forget, they still have to "break" the "vacumn" to get out of the air and onto the ground (I am sure a technocrat will correct my explanation), so should expect a bump. A lot also depends on conditions, cross winds, etc at the time.

Some runways, like MNL are bumpy already, which doeasn't help!
Reply With Quote
  #6 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 03:34 PM
NM's Avatar
NM NM is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member of: AA Exec Plat; QF LTG; PC Plat; HHonors Gold
Posts: 10,055
And if you happen be on an aircraft that doing an auto-land, you will notice the bump! Both pilots and aircraft have to perform auto-land operations on a regular basis to ensure they remain accredited to do so in weather conditions that require it. So from time to time an auto-land will be undertaken in good weather conditions to ensure either pilot or aircraft remains current.
__________________
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Reply With Quote
Sponsored Links
Registered Users have the option of removing this and all other advertisements.  More
  #7 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 04:39 PM
serfty's Avatar
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Member of: ¤QF WP[96-01,05-09] 103%LT SG ¤HHG
Posts: 8,618
-correction, not about auto land, more about "Rough Landings".


The 146's were really smooth in this regard; many time the only indcation of touch down was a vibration though the fueslage as the wheels started rolling along the runway.
__________________
utilities¤)
Reply With Quote
  #8 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 05:00 PM
NM's Avatar
NM NM is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Member of: AA Exec Plat; QF LTG; PC Plat; HHonors Gold
Posts: 10,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by serfty
The 146's were really smooth in this regard; many time the only indcation of touch down was a vibration though the fueslage as the wheels started rolling along the runway.
Don't know if I have ever experienced an auto-land in a 146. I didn't know they were certified for it, but really don't know much about them.

I did once have the pleasure of sitting in the flight deck of a QF 744 for an Autoland (into LAX). Initially the weather conditions were such that it was going to be a normal pilot-in-control type landing, but the clouds lifted and the captain radioed ATC to inform them he was going to do an auto-land (at least the aircraft was). He explained that when they boarded the aircraft, the records had indicated that this particular aircraft was going to lose its currency certification for auto-land soon, so he was relieved when the clouds lifted. Such tests need to be carried out in VFR conditions so the pilots can monitor and take over at any time if the computers are not doing it right.

The captain explained there are only a few airports around the world where they do the auto-land tests do to having the right category of ground equip for full auto-land capability. So if they were unable to do it that time at LAX, it would be possible that the aircraft would not be in a position to test again before its currency expired and that would mean they could not auto-land under weather/visibility conditions that may require it, and would have to divert to another airport with full auto-land was not required. Unfortunately, none of the Australian airports have the right equipment for full auto-lands in zero visibility (Cat III). Not sure what is in place in SYD and MEL and if they can be used for the aircraft currency testing???

It was a very interesting experience watching the controls, including yoke and thrust levers, moving themselves as the aircraft landed. I think the engine reverse thrust was still done manually, but wheel breaking is automatic. The captain lines it up on the ILS and then hit the button for the computer to take over, then sat back and watched.
__________________
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Reply With Quote
  #9 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 05:13 PM
Warks's Avatar
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Sydney
Member of: QFF Silver, QC, UA
Posts: 185
Remember that list of pilot's complaints and the corresponding engineer's comments? It was an email a few years back (post it if you have it someone!) One pilot comment was:
"Auto-land is exceedingly rough." To which the engineer replied:
"Auto-land not fitted on this aircraft"

Quick google...
Found it!

Quote:
These are some entries from aircraft snag sheets.
This is where the pilots write down any problems they find with the aircraft and the engineers repair it and write down what the problem was and what was done about it.

( P = Pilot )
( E = Engineer )

P: Left inside tyre almost needs replacing
E: Almost replaced left inside tyre

P: Test flight OK but auto-landing system very rough
E: Auto-landing not installed on this aircraft

P: Something loose in cockpit
E: Something tightened in cockpit

P: Evidence of leak on right landing gear
E: Evidence removed

P: Number 3 engine missing
E: Number 3 engine found on right wing after brief search

P: Aircraft handles funny
E: Aircraft warned to straighten up, fly right and be serious

P: Radar hums
E: Reprogrammed radar with lyrics.

P: Mouse in cockpit
E: Cat installed
Reply With Quote
  #10 (permalink)  
Old 13th April 2006, 11:33 PM
straitman's Avatar
Established Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: SE Oz
Member of: Qantas, UA
Posts: 4,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by NM
It was a very interesting experience watching the controls, including yoke and thrust levers, moving themselves as the aircraft landed. I think the engine reverse thrust was still done manually, but wheel breaking is automatic. The captain lines it up on the ILS and then hit the button for the computer to take over, then sat back and watched.
This is the same as any ILS performed by the flight director (which is nearly all approaches these days) just that the a/c is left on auto through the "Decision Height"

I sat through one such landing at LAX on a Pan Am 74? in 1982. The Captain pre warned the pax that it would be an auto landing and that they (the pilots) would be following through on the flight controls in the event that there was a problem. After landing the Captain came back on the PA and said something to the effect that anyone looking out the windows would have noticed that the auto landing didn't really go to plan and that the pilots had taken over.

It wasn't pretty to watch at all

__________________
cheers,
Bill.

Oz Fest #6" - Cairns Queensland - Memorial Day Weekend, May 22-24, 2009
_______________________________
QFF Gold (OW Sapphire,) 65.21% toward Lifetime Silver, UA Nothing, HHonors Gold, PC Platinum, Hertz Gold No 1, Ansett -- nothing any more!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


All times are GMT +11. The time now is 05:40 PM.


 
Powered by vBulletin Version 3.7.0. Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 RC4 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
Designed by
 
Copyright © 1998 - 2009, The Australian Frequent Flyer. All Rights Reserved.

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83