Registered Users have the option of removing this |
She certainly did read the conditions attached to the purchase - all four pages of them - and there was no mention of this.
It all boils down to Qantas wanting to make more money out of child travellers and so charging them adult fares. It would be very simple to add text to the booking page to inform customers that a 14 year-old 'adult' is not allowed to escort a 'child', but to do that would draw even more attention to the high cost of buying an adult ticket for a 14 year-old.
In order to remove any such inconsistencies, Qantas simply needs to increase the child fare age limit to 14 years. How much profit could this possibly eliminate?
"Family. Religion. Friendship. These are the three demons you must slay if you wish to succeed in business" - C. Montgomery Burns
First Class isn't a seat, it's a lifestyle.
"You cannot spend money in luxury without doing good to the poor. Nay, you do more good to them by spending it in luxury, than by giving it; for by spending it in luxury, you make them exert industry, whereas by giving it, you keep them idle."-
Samuel Johnson
NM aka Nelly Mobbs
Common sense should have told her this...
Maybe they could eliminate child fares altogether? I recently took the kids down to Sydney on Jetstar and paid the same price for both kids and adults. They are taking up a seat, so I can't see the problem here.In order to remove any such inconsistencies, Qantas simply needs to increase the child fare age limit to 14 years.
(¤utilities¤)
In the land of logic, given that the 14 year old was accompanied by the 3 year old, then how could either be logically classed as unaccompanied
Dave
I have no doubt about who is responsible. The greatest responsibility I have ever taken on in my life has been having someone else's life in my hands. I took on that responsibility when I had children. I've never liked the idea of children caring for children - it is the parents responsibility. I have great respect for the youth in question - he is obviously very responsible (for a 14 year old) and clearly loves and cares for his sibling. However, he should never have been placed in such a position. You can argue the rules and regulations on age limits till you are blue in the face, it won't change my mind on who is responsible for a 2 year old.
All I know is that QF,DJ and JQ have all allocated me a seat at the back of the plane when I have flown unaccompanied and every time I have had a lot of under 15 year olds as my neighbours.The under 4's though have always been with their mothers.
I'm sorry but i just feel the woman was thoughtless.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)