Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Robert Barlow
BTW, what does one do with an expensive camera if travelling to the LOTFAP now in the light of recent events?
|
That's a thorny little question. I just spend some time poring over the PDS's of various travel insurers to see how the insurance offered by a CC company stacks up against a standalone. The answer is: it depends. Some policies don't cover additional items (cameras, computer gear, jewellery) if they're in checked baggage whereas others don't specify a type of carriage for your items. That goes for both standalone and CC insurance. The catch for all of them is that you're only insured for the
current value of your camera - so that $5000 piece of kit you bought 2 years ago might be valued at a fraction of that now.
The bottom line as I saw it was that if you're a casual or tourist traveller who doesn't carry a fortune in luggage (eg expensive clothes, laptops) then the insurance offered by CC companies is adequate and covers all the basics that you need - medical, repatriation, lost baggage, emergency supplies and accomodation, cancellations - at reasonable amounts that compare well with standalones. For me, that makes the card-offered insurance a good deal as the only expensive gear I carry is my camera kit and because its > 1yr old (and I picked up a number of lenses 2nd hand) then I won't get full replacement value on it with
any policy and I have no intention of flying to the LOTFAP any time soon.
If you've got other needs though - rental excess, physical activities (eg bungy jumping), higher and more comprehensive luggage coverage, not buying all the travel on the card - then you're really better off with standalone cover.