Which freq flyer program is better: Singapore or Thai ?
Which freq flyer program is better: Singapore or Thai ?.
Discuss Which freq flyer program is better: Singapore or Thai ?, on the General Airline Loyalty Program Discussion forum of FrequentFlyer.com.au, the home of frequent flyers.
Welcome to Australia's leading independent Frequent Flyers resource! We hope you find the information useful and decide to join our online community. Its free to join, simply click on the register link. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I did a research sometime back. Thai seemed to be more generous with moving up in the status and awards (they have companion awards at a discount). However, as I flew SQ more than Thai decided to stick with SQ.
Not sure of the current scenario.
Haven't as yet, but will be looking for a *A FF program to join, so will be inetrested in any views on the two programs
Hi Mark,
My recommendation would be UA's Mileage Plus (I'm a 1K, Million Mile member, but don't let that put you off).
Basically, Mileage Plus will give you 100% bonus miles after 50,000. I can't see an Asian airline doing that, and you can use your miles to redeem awards on any Star Alliance carrier (I never use my miles for UA awards!).
I don't have a problem with that.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding your reason for for that.
The purpose of this thread was to read about other peoples experience.
I'd be interested to hear of yours.
It depends on where you fly and what class of travel.
For example if you fly on SQ and in business or first then can earn status on SQ (through PPS program) and miles on TG at the same time.
Havent studied in depth but my impression is TG is easier to earn and maintain *Gold status but SQ may be better earn:burn rates (esp if get status bonus through flying SQ).
I don't have a problem with that.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding your reason for for that.
The purpose of this thread was to read about other peoples experience.
I'd be interested to hear of yours.
Ian of Sydney
Sorry to take so long to respond however I’ve been attempting to rationalise a few reasons that would make external sense so I’ll break the response into three sections.
1. Put simply, Thai don’t fly to places that I’d normally frequent so I have no reason to ever join their program.
2. Some of the background of Singapore Airlines has been covered quite some time ago within these forums and I believe that Shillard is one of their major detractors. As a student of aviation studies, I have to say that Singapore Airlines has a great history with its “Singapore Girl” image and totally impressive standards of service and I agree that their cabin service approaches second to none. Their aircraft are more modern than most and they don’t have many notable incidents. I must also say though, that there is more to aviation than new aircraft and wonderful cabin service. Over the years, there has been conjecture about their real safety record versus their perceived safety record and the amount that good luck plays in the final outcome.
3. Both these airlines are part of Star Alliance which has no Australian membership (post Ansett) so would be of no value for the majority of flights by most Australians. Qantas may not be the best with regard to cabin service (although they’re not bad) however, they are amongst the safest and my first preference is to get to the destination safely. I know of other airlines that are frequently mentioned here for better service than Qantas that have a lot more problems that Qantas.
__________________
cheers,
Bill.
themenuplanners.com
_______________________________
QFF Platinum (OW Emerald,) 65.21% toward Lifetime Silver, UA Nothing, HHonors Gold, PC Platinum, Hertz Gold No 1, Ansett -- nothing any more!