Which freq flyer program is better: Singapore or Thai ?

Ian of Sydney · #1 (**permalink**) 31st October 2004, 04:42 PM

Hi,

Wondering if you have had experienced or studied the details of these two FF programs. In your opinion which is the better option, and why ?

Cheers

Ian of Sydney

oz_mark · #2 (**permalink**) 31st October 2004, 04:53 PM

Haven't as yet, but will be looking for a *A FF program to join, so will be inetrested in any views on the two programs

arun · #3 (**permalink**) 31st October 2004, 05:34 PM

I did a research sometime back. Thai seemed to be more generous with moving up in the status and awards (they have companion awards at a discount). However, as I flew SQ more than Thai decided to stick with SQ.
Not sure of the current scenario.

clifford · #4 (**permalink**) 1st November 2004, 08:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by oz_mark

Haven't as yet, but will be looking for a *A FF program to join, so will be inetrested in any views on the two programs

Hi Mark,

My recommendation would be UA's Mileage Plus (I'm a 1K, Million Mile member, but don't let that put you off).

Basically, Mileage Plus will give you 100% bonus miles after 50,000. I can't see an Asian airline doing that, and you can use your miles to redeem awards on any Star Alliance carrier (I never use my miles for UA awards!).

For thadocta, please butt out.

Ian of Sydney · #5 (**permalink**) 2nd November 2004, 05:49 PM

Hi,

Please keep replies "on topic" by referring to the two FF programs Singapore or Thai. I'm not interested in other airline programs.

If you wish to explore a wider selection of programs, it's better to begin another post to avoid making the discussion confusing.

Thanks for your understanding.

Regards
Ian of Sydney

straitman · #6 (**permalink**) 2nd November 2004, 06:11 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian of Sydney

Hi,

Please keep replies "on topic" by referring to the two FF programs Singapore or Thai. I'm not interested in other airline programs.

If you wish to explore a wider selection of programs, it's better to begin another post to avoid making the discussion confusing.

Thanks for your understanding.

Regards
Ian of Sydney

OK, you asked for it.

1. Neither,
2. I wouldn't fly either of these airlines by choice.

Ian of Sydney · #7 (**permalink**) 2nd November 2004, 08:50 PM

Thanks,

I don't have a problem with that.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding your reason for for that.
The purpose of this thread was to read about other peoples experience.
I'd be interested to hear of yours.

Ian of Sydney

pomjim · #8 (**permalink**) 3rd November 2004, 01:04 PM

straitman

I'd be interested as well, 'cos in my 'umble, Singapore s***s over Qantas any day.

Kiwi Flyer · #9 (**permalink**) 6th November 2004, 10:13 AM

It depends on where you fly and what class of travel.

For example if you fly on SQ and in business or first then can earn status on SQ (through PPS program) and miles on TG at the same time.

Havent studied in depth but my impression is TG is easier to earn and maintain *Gold status but SQ may be better earn:burn rates (esp if get status bonus through flying SQ).

straitman · #10 (**permalink**) 6th November 2004, 11:28 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ian of Sydney

Thanks,

I don't have a problem with that.
Perhaps you wouldn't mind adding your reason for for that.
The purpose of this thread was to read about other peoples experience.
I'd be interested to hear of yours.

Ian of Sydney

Sorry to take so long to respond however I’ve been attempting to rationalise a few reasons that would make external sense so I’ll break the response into three sections.

1. Put simply, Thai don’t fly to places that I’d normally frequent so I have no reason to ever join their program.

2. Some of the background of Singapore Airlines has been covered quite some time ago within these forums and I believe that Shillard is one of their major detractors. As a student of aviation studies, I have to say that Singapore Airlines has a great history with its “Singapore Girl” image and totally impressive standards of service and I agree that their cabin service approaches second to none. Their aircraft are more modern than most and they don’t have many notable incidents. I must also say though, that there is more to aviation than new aircraft and wonderful cabin service. Over the years, there has been conjecture about their real safety record versus their perceived safety record and the amount that good luck plays in the final outcome.

3. Both these airlines are part of Star Alliance which has no Australian membership (post Ansett) so would be of no value for the majority of flights by most Australians. Qantas may not be the best with regard to cabin service (although they’re not bad) however, they are amongst the safest and my first preference is to get to the destination safely. I know of other airlines that are frequently mentioned here for better service than Qantas that have a lot more problems that Qantas.